SWISSTEP / KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY

Reports, white papers and practical guidance

Technical protocols, implementation frameworks and policy documents for movement-monitoring programmes.

These resources address decisions that journal abstracts rarely resolve: operational definitions, protocol execution, implementation requirements and regulatory interpretation. Publisher and document-type labels distinguish independent guidance from manufacturer-authored technical or commercial material.

FallsClinical guidance

CDC STEADI clinical resources

Editorial relevance

Clinical implementation materials connecting mobility and balance assessment to a multifactorial falls pathway. Use the named protocols to standardise administration, then integrate their findings with medication review, fall history and other relevant domains.

Practical use. Anchor a sensor-informed service to a defined assessment and response pathway; retain prospective fall ascertainment when evaluating effectiveness.

Visit original resource →

RegulationClinical investigations

FDA remote data acquisition guidance

Editorial relevance

FDA guidance on digital health technologies used for remote acquisition in clinical investigations. It addresses fitness for purpose, verification and validation, usability and the management of remotely collected data.

Practical use. Map endpoint requirements to technology selection, participant training, data integrity and retention. The document supports investigation design; product marketing status requires its own intended-use assessment.

Visit original resource →

MethodsValidation

DiMe V3 resources

Editorial relevance

Framework resources for separating sensor verification, analytical validation and clinical validation, complemented by V3+ usability considerations.

Practical use. Build an evidence matrix identifying which claims are supported, which configurations were evaluated and where intended-population evidence remains incomplete. Consult the underlying papers for definitions and framework scope.

Visit original resource →

RehabilitationCompany resources

OneStep resource centre

Editorial relevance

Provider-authored research summaries, case material, webinars and white papers on smartphone gait measurement and remote clinical workflows. These resources help identify practical acquisition and implementation questions.

Practical use. Trace numerical or clinical-effect claims to their originating study and distinguish a described workflow from a prospectively evaluated intervention. The research library is a useful starting point for teams assessing smartphone-based collection.

Visit original resource →

FallsCompany white paper

OneStep fall-risk white paper

Editorial relevance

A provider-authored account of gait-centred fall-risk assessment in skilled nursing settings. Read it as an implementation and evidence-appraisal resource alongside the original analyses.

Practical use. Examine cohort selection, prospective versus retrospective fall ascertainment, prediction horizon, calibration and external validation. Report alert workload and the intervention triggered by a classification when assessing clinical utility. Access may require registration with OneStep.

Visit original resource →

ReimbursementUS Medicare

CMS telehealth and remote monitoring booklet

Editorial relevance

A primary CMS orientation to Medicare telehealth and remote-monitoring services. Coverage, coding and payment depend on the specific service and applicable date-of-service requirements.

Practical use. Reconcile the proposed workflow with eligible practitioners, device and data requirements, consent, documented management and interaction time. Use current payer instructions for billing decisions.

Visit original resource →

KinematicsTechnical white paper

Xsens MVN gait report

Editorial relevance

Technical documentation describing inertial motion-capture gait outputs and report generation. It supports evaluation of the acquisition-to-report workflow and the scope of the derived kinematic measures.

Practical use. Compare coordinate and model conventions with the intended biomechanical analysis. Use independent, parameter-specific measurement studies when judging agreement or clinical interpretation.

Visit original resource →

How to use the ratings and topic labels

Stars indicate editorial relevance to clinicians and researchers using this library: 5 = foundational or broadly applicable; 4 = directly useful for a defined question; 3 = specialist or emerging application; 2 = indirect relevance; 1 = background context. They are not journal impact factors, evidence-certainty grades, product comparisons or estimates of clinical benefit. Lists place higher-relevance entries first; chronological steps and test protocols retain their required sequence. Topic labels use the same colors throughout the library, with text identifying every subject.

PAtch login

The platform login address is awaiting configuration. This website does not collect your password.